<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on iPhoto GPS weirdness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glaikit.org/2010/07/10/more-on-iphoto-gps-weirdness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glaikit.org/2010/07/10/more-on-iphoto-gps-weirdness/</link>
	<description>lost, to five decimal places</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scruss</title>
		<link>http://glaikit.org/2010/07/10/more-on-iphoto-gps-weirdness/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>scruss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glaikit.org/?p=471#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think so; you&#039;re as likely as not to live at the 0.01&#039; intervals that Apple assigns. I suspect it&#039;s deliberate truncation due to number format conversion. Exif uses a slightly weird structure to store these values (Rational64: 64-bit ints as numerator and denominator) and I bet Apple just wedged it into a convenient integer format for their metadata storage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so; you&#8217;re as likely as not to live at the 0.01&#8242; intervals that Apple assigns. I suspect it&#8217;s deliberate truncation due to number format conversion. Exif uses a slightly weird structure to store these values (Rational64: 64-bit ints as numerator and denominator) and I bet Apple just wedged it into a convenient integer format for their metadata storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://glaikit.org/2010/07/10/more-on-iphoto-gps-weirdness/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glaikit.org/?p=471#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Privacy concerns? I doubt they&#039;d just randomly munge data, and Jobs has been making lots of noise about how they consider privacy more important than other companies *cough*google*cough*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privacy concerns? I doubt they&#8217;d just randomly munge data, and Jobs has been making lots of noise about how they consider privacy more important than other companies *cough*google*cough*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

